Make member introductions
Propose and facilitate a mutually relevant introduction based on expressed goals and separate consent from both people rather than inferred similarity or activity data.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Business area | community |
| Primary role | community-manager |
| Frequency | event-driven |
| Privacy sensitivity | high |
| Security sensitivity | low |
| Compliance review | needed |
Trigger and handoff
Trigger: Staff identify a plausible mutual benefit or a member asks for a connection.
Inputs
- Expressed member goals
- Current consent and contact preferences
- Community manager context
Outputs
- Consented introduction or respectful non-action
- Brief purpose and suggested next step
Current manual methods
- Spontaneous in-person introduction
- Shared contact details
- Memory-based matching
Human judgment and approvals
-
Assess mutual relevance and power dynamics
-
Phrase context without overclaiming fit
-
Approval: Both members approve the introduction and information shared
Failure modes
- One party did not consent
- Sensitive business plans or personal details are disclosed
Success metrics
- Introductions have bilateral consent
- Members report relevance without pressure to continue