Review workload and wellbeing
Discuss demand, control, support, recovery time, role clarity, difficult interactions, and sustainable adjustments with staff rather than inferring wellbeing from productivity or presence data.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Business area | staff-administration |
| Primary role | general-manager |
| Frequency | monthly |
| Privacy sensitivity | high |
| Security sensitivity | low |
| Compliance review | needed |
Trigger and handoff
Trigger: Scheduled one-to-one or team review, material workload change, absence pattern, or staff-raised concern.
Inputs
- Staff-provided experience
- Roster and work-demand evidence
- Open role and process issues
Outputs
- Agreed support and workload actions
- Escalated safety or specialist need
- Follow-up date
Current manual methods
- Informal check-in
- Overtime total
- Annual engagement survey
Human judgment and approvals
-
Listen without diagnosing and recognize risk signals
-
Balance confidentiality
-
duty of care
-
fairness
-
and operational change
-
Approval: Staff member and manager agree routine actions; qualified people owner handles sensitive or formal measures
Failure modes
- Dashboard is used to diagnose an individual
- Staff disclosure is shared beyond need
Success metrics
- Agreed actions complete and are reviewed for effect
- Repeated overload signals prompt capacity or process decisions